当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Journal of the Legal Profession › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The limits and benefits of international mobility: an empirical examination of the biographies of Australian legal academics
International Journal of the Legal Profession Pub Date : 2019-12-11 , DOI: 10.1080/09695958.2019.1699418
Angela Melville 1 , Amy Barrow 2 , Patrick Morgan 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Academics are becoming increasingly internationally mobile, and yet there is still limited research into the nature, outcomes and limits of academic mobility. This paper examines the biographies of over 700 academics employed within Australian law schools. It identifies legal academics who hold academics qualifications have been employed outside of Australia. Almost a quarter of legal academics in our sample hold a first degree outside of Australia, over a third hold a non-Australian post-graduate degree. While it could be expected that possessing international experience would broaden an academic’s cultural experiences, we also found that the internationally mobile academics have typically studied and worked previously within an elite international law school, and are now employed within an elite Australian law school. In addition, experiences of international mobility are not equally distributed, and male legal academics are significantly more likely to have international experience than female legal academics.

中文翻译:

国际流动的局限性和利益:对澳大利亚法律学者传记的实证研究

摘要学术界人士日益在国际上流动,但对学术流动性,性质和局限性的研究仍然有限。本文研究了澳大利亚法学院聘用的700多名学者的传记。它标识拥有在澳大利亚以外地区受雇的具有学术资格的法律学者。在我们的样本中,将近四分之一的法律学者在澳大利亚境外获得了第一学位,超过三分之一的人则获得了非澳大利亚的研究生学位。可以预期,拥有国际经验将拓宽学者的文化经验,但我们还发现,国际流动的学者通常以前曾在国际精英法学院学习和工作,现在在澳大利亚精英法学院工作。此外,
更新日期:2019-12-11
down
wechat
bug