ABSTRACT This article explores the influence and reception of the Kierkegaardian self in modern theology, focusing on the philosopher Martin Heidegger and the theologian Eberhard Jüngel. In an attempt to transcend the atheistic philosophy of modernity, Eberhard Jüngel responded to the active, choosing self of modernity, as propounded Heidegger, by proposing an account of existence that is instead passive before God. However, as Heidegger’s philosophy itself is deeply in debt to Kierkegaard’s account of existence, Jüngel’s response to this active, choosing self both echoes and is radically distant from Kierkegaard’s account of selfhood, wishing to have transformative faith in God but to move away from the individual relationship to God to a more communal, relational model. This article explores the debt that these thinkers have to Kierkegaard, and whether, in changing the active repetition of faith for the passivity of relational faith, Jüngel manages to overcome his own debt to Kierkegaard’s account of the self before God.

中文翻译：

---

自我和绝望：基尔凯郭尔，海德格尔和琼格尔的焦虑存在

摘要本文探讨哲学家马丁·海德格尔（Martin Heidegger）和神学家埃伯哈德·詹格尔（EberhardJüngel）在现代神学中对克尔凯郭尔式自我的影响和接受。为了超越现代性的无神论哲学，埃伯哈德·琼格尔（EberhardJüngel）提出了对存在的选择，在上帝面前是被动的，以此回应海德格尔所提出的选择现代性的自我。然而，由于海德格尔的哲学本身对克尔凯郭尔的存在深有欠债，所以詹格尔对这种积极，选择自我的反应既与克尔凯郭尔的自尊相呼应，又与之完全背离，他希望对上帝抱有变革性的信念，但要远离个人与神之间的关系是一种更公共的关系模型。本文探讨了这些思想家对克尔凯郭尔的债务，