ABSTRACT In his 1927 lecture ‘Phenomenology and Theology’, Heidegger claims that philosophy is the formally indicative ontological co-direction [Mitleitung] of basic theological concepts. For this claim, he proposes the example of his ontological concept of guilt (i.e. ‘being-guilty’ [Schuldigsein]) as a formal indication [formale Anzeige] which functions as a co-direction for the theological concept of sin. This paper examines how ‘being-guilty’ and ‘sin’ can be related in this way. First, I introduce Heidegger’s notion of formal indication. Next, I explore the ontological meaning of ‘being-guilty’ in Being and Time. Then, I investigate the theological issue of sin with reference to Heidegger’s reading of Luther. Finally, I argue for the cogency of Heidegger’s claim by demonstrating the way in which ‘being-guilty’ can formally indicate and co-direct the meaning of ‘sin’.

中文翻译：

---

海德格尔对本体论的“有罪”概念与路德的“罪”的神学概念之间的关系的理解

摘要海德格尔在1927年的“现象学与神学”演讲中声称，哲学是基本神学概念的形式上的本体论共同指导[Mitleitung]。对于这一主张，他提出了自己的有罪本体论概念（即“有罪” [Schuldigsein]）作为形式指示[形式Anzeige]的示例，该形式作为罪的神学概念的共同指导。本文研究了如何通过这种方式将“内gui”和“罪”联系起来。首先，我介绍海德格尔的形式指示概念。接下来，我探讨“存在与时间”中“内-”的本体论意义。然后，我参考海德格尔对路德的阅读来研究罪的神学问题。最后，