ABSTRACT Throughout his published work, Michel Henry expresses a deep appreciation for the writings of Kierkegaard, using them as an inspirational foundation for much of his own thought. However, Henry claims to be far more Kierkegaardian than he really is. Henry’s peers have identified several philosophical and theological deficiencies in Henry’s thought. These places of weakness also happen to be his most obvious points of departure from Kierkegaard. A Kierkegaardian confrontation with Henry demands a retrieval of the Infinite Qualitative Difference (IQD) between God and man as key to exploring the structure of the self. Kierkegaard’s texts correct Henry’s assumption that the ontological difference established in the act of creation would separate the self from God. They suggest instead that the IQD provides the necessary conditions for the truly theological self to emerge.

中文翻译：

---

如何穿越魔方而不会陷入困境：米歇尔·亨利（Michel Henry），索伦·基克高（SørenKierkegaard）和新现象

摘要在整个已发表的作品中，米歇尔·亨利（Michel Henry）对基尔凯郭尔的著作深表赞赏，并将其作为他自己许多思想的鼓舞性基础。但是，亨利声称自己比实际的要多得多。亨利的同僚已经发现了亨利思想中的一些哲学和神学缺陷。这些弱点也恰好是他与基尔凯郭尔最明显的出发点。Kierkegaardian与Henry的对抗要求取回上帝与人之间的无限定性差异（IQD），这是探索自我结构的关键。Kierkegaard的文本纠正了Henry的假设，即在创造行为中建立的本体论差异会将自我与上帝分开。