ABSTRACT Derrida’s philosophy is usually known as a form of critique of metaphysics. This article, however, argues that Derrida’s deconstructions do not only dismantle metaphysics from within, but also remain in themselves thoroughly, and problematically, metaphysical. Its goal is to determine exactly where the metaphysical features of Derrida’s work can be found. The article starts with an analysis of Derrida’s understanding of metaphysics, as well as its deconstruction, by explaining the working of différance, mainly focusing on its temporality. Further, it will demonstrate how in the temporization or deferral of différance a metaphysical desire for purity remains effective. In readings of several texts, the mutual interdependence of metaphysics and deconstruction will be sketched. Then the ethical side of deconstruction will be highlighted, both in Derrida’s early work as well as in the slightly different elaboration of différance in the later ethical notions like justice, the gift and the messianic. This results in a distinction of three versions of différance. Finally, a critical discussion of the metaphysical side of deconstruction will be followed by a comparison of different readings of deconstruction and différance.

中文翻译：

---

作为时态化的延异及其问题

摘要 德里达的哲学通常被称为形而上学批判的一种形式。然而，这篇文章认为，德里达的解构不仅从内部拆解了形而上学，而且还彻底地、有问题地保持了形而上学。它的目标是准确确定德里达作品的形而上学特征在哪里可以找到。本文首先分析德里达对形而上学的理解及其解构，解释延异的工作，主要关注其时间性。此外，它将证明在延异的时间化或延迟中，对纯洁的形而上学的渴望如何保持有效。在阅读几篇文本时，将勾勒出形而上学与解构主义的相互依存关系。然后解构的伦理方面将被突出，无论是在德里达的早期作品中，还是在后来的伦理概念（如正义、礼物和弥赛亚）中对差异的略微不同的阐述中。这导致了差异的三个版本的区别。最后，在对解构的形而上学方面进行批判性讨论之后，将对解构和延异的不同解读进行比较。