当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Journal of Mental Health › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Empirical structure of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder traits in Arabic-speaking Algerian culture
International Journal of Mental Health ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-10 , DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2020.1732624
Bo Bach 1 , Fares Zine El Abiddine 2
Affiliation  

Abstract Mental health professionals using the DSM-5 and ICD-11 are allowed to describe personality disorders in terms of trait domain qualifiers (i.e., Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism/Dissociality, Disinhibition, Anankastia, and Psychoticism). The present study sought to evaluate the structural validity of both DSM-5 and ICD-11 traits in Algerian culture. Algerian university students (N = 638; 67.9% women) were administered the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 – Brief Form (PID-5-BF). The expected empirical domain organization of DSM-5 and ICD-11 traits was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by a post hoc confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). As anticipated, the five-factor pattern overall corresponded to the five DSM-5 trait domains, including a domain of Psychoticism. Likewise, the four-factor structure overall aligned with the ICD-11 trait domain qualifiers, including a single factor denoting Disinhibition versus low Anankastia. However, a few items showed less adequate functioning across the two models, possibly due to cultural differences. Findings provided some support for the structural validity of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder trait models in Algerian culture, and the trait patterns overall resembled international findings on DSM-5 and ICD-11 trait domains. Future research warrants replication in clinical populations, and association with various health outcomes should be explored.

中文翻译:

阿拉伯语阿尔及利亚文化中DSM-5和ICD-11人格障碍特征的经验结构

摘要允许使用DSM-5和ICD-11的心理健康专业人员按照特质领域限定词(即负情感,分离,拮抗/解散,禁忌,厌食症和精神病)描述人格障碍。本研究试图评估DSM-5和ICD-11性状在阿尔及利亚文化中的结构有效性。阿尔及利亚的大学生(N = 638; 67.9%的女性)被管理了DSM-5个性清单-简要表(PID-5-BF)。使用探索性因素分析(EFA),然后进行事后确认性因素分析(CFA),检查了预期的DSM-5和ICD-11性状的经验域结构。如预期的那样,五因素模式总体上对应于五个DSM-5性状域,包括精神病域。同样 四因子结构总体上与ICD-11性状域限定词一致,其中包括一个表示Disinhibition与低Anankastia的因子。但是,可能由于文化差异,一些项目在两个模型之间的功能不足。这些发现为阿尔及利亚文化中DSM-5和ICD-11人格障碍特征模型的结构有效性提供了支持,其特征模式总体上与DSM-5和ICD-11特征域的国际发现相似。未来的研究需要在临床人群中复制,并应探索与各种健康结果的关系。可能是由于文化差异。这些发现为阿尔及利亚文化中DSM-5和ICD-11人格障碍特征模型的结构有效性提供了支持,其特征模式总体上与DSM-5和ICD-11特征域的国际发现相似。未来的研究需要在临床人群中复制,并应探索与各种健康结果的关系。可能是由于文化差异。这些发现为阿尔及利亚文化中DSM-5和ICD-11人格障碍特征模型的结构有效性提供了支持,其特征模式总体上与DSM-5和ICD-11特征域的国际发现相似。未来的研究需要在临床人群中复制,并应探索与各种健康结果的关系。
更新日期:2020-03-10
down
wechat
bug