Over the past few years, one of Indonesia’s state-owned enterprises, PLN, has conducted dialogues focusing on developing a new value-creative business model to transform itself, a sleepy regulated utility, into a truly competitive electricity service provider. However, efforts to preserve the prominence of the Country’s electricity sector have been ongoing as the sector is still experiencing sustained rolling blackouts, net import dependency and lack of transmission facility enforcement throughout the Indonesian archipelago. Such efforts have been varied from the incentivise policy and programs such as the Public-Private Partnership and the two phases of Fast Track Program. The reformation of electricity law dated back on the 1985, 2002 and 2009 to attract investors in the development of Indonesia’s electricity sector have been enacted, but a controversial issue arose from the annulment of the Law No. 20 Year 2002 on Electricity by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003 stating that such law which clearly stating that the requirement to privatise electricity operation was inconstitutional. This article will try to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of such decision with the common practice adopted by the EU which has successfully implemented its deregulation and separation of the electricity’s business chain through unbundling the sector as part of liberalisation.

中文翻译：

---

印度尼西亚的能源安全：我们保护得对吗？从欧盟吸取的教训

在过去几年中，印度尼西亚的国有企业之一 PLN 进行了对话，重点是开发一种新的价值创造商业模式，以将自己这个沉睡的受监管公用事业公司转变为真正具有竞争力的电力服务提供商。然而，由于该部门仍在经历持续的轮流停电、净进口依赖以及整个印度尼西亚群岛缺乏输电设施执法，因此一直在努力保持该国电力部门的突出地位。这些努力与激励政策和计划不同，例如公私合作伙伴关系和快速通道计划的两个阶段。1985 年、2002 年和 2009 年颁布的电力法改革旨在吸引投资者发展印度尼西亚的电力部门，但由于宪法法院第 001-021-022/PUU-I/2​​003 号决定废除了 2002 年第 20 号电力法，该法律引起了一个有争议的问题，该法明确规定了电力运营私有化的要求违宪。本文将尝试对此类决定与欧盟采用的普遍做法进行全面比较分析，欧盟通过将电力行业分拆作为自由化的一部分，成功实施了放松管制和电力业务链分离。