当前位置: X-MOL 学术Indonesia Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
FINDING A FAIR LAND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM BETWEEN ADAT LAW COMMUNITY VS. INVESTOR
Indonesia Law Review ( IF 0.1 ) Pub Date : 2016-12-29 , DOI: 10.15742/ilrev.v6n3.252
Ratih Lestarini

Land utilization for investment in local areas raises various land related problems that ends with conflicts within the community. A conflict that occurs, usually begins with the management of communal land “ tanah ulayat ” within the adat law community environment, and in this case, land utilization that is managed by the third party (investors). The basic problem is the difference of perception and expectations toward the company that exists in the land which is claimed by the community. Both parties have their own claim on the land based on each legal systems, in this situation adat law or local law faced with state law which is used by investors. So far, the Indonesian government has yet to have legal grounds in giving a directions for land dispute/conflict settlement mechanism. This paper attempts to give an input regarding a land dispute settlement mechanism that can be accepted for all disputing parties. The paper features critical analysis using legal pluralism approach towards related government policies and technical regulations in the ministerial level. These regulations, among others are, Minister of Agrarian Regulation No. 5 of 1999 on the Guidance for Dispute Settlement of Communal Land Rights, and Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Affairs Regulation No. 9 of 2015 on Procedures of Appointment of Communal Land Rights for Adat Law Community and Communities Located in certain regions, also the draft of Law regarding Recognition and Protection of Adat Law Community.

中文翻译:

在 ADAT 法律社区与社区之间寻找公平的土地纠纷解决机制 投资者

在当地投资的土地利用引发了各种与土地相关的问题,并以社区内部的冲突告终。发生的冲突通常始于 adat 法社区环境内的公共土地“tanah ulayat”的管理,在这种情况下,由第三方(投资者)管理的土地利用。基本问题是对存在于社区声称的土地上的公司的看法和期望的差异。双方对基于每个法律体系的土地都有自己的要求,在这种情况下,adat 法律或当地法律面临投资者使用的州法律。到目前为止,印度尼西亚政府尚未有法律依据来为土地纠纷/冲突解决机制提供方向。本文试图就所有争端方都能接受的土地争端解决机制提供意见。本文以法律多元化的方法对部级相关政府政策和技术法规进行批判性分析。这些规定包括 1999 年第 5 号关于公有土地权利纠纷解决指南的土地部长条例和 2015 年第 9 号土地和空间事务部关于 Adat 的公有土地权利任命程序的条例。法律社区和社区 位于某些地区,还有关于承认和保护 Adat 法律社区的法律草案。本文以法律多元化的方法对部级相关政府政策和技术法规进行批判性分析。这些规定包括 1999 年第 5 号关于公有土地权利纠纷解决指南的土地部长条例和 2015 年第 9 号土地和空间事务部关于 Adat 的公有土地权利任命程序的条例。法律社区和社区 位于某些地区,还有关于承认和保护 Adat 法律社区的法律草案。本文以法律多元化的方法对部级相关政府政策和技术法规进行批判性分析。这些规定包括 1999 年第 5 号关于公有土地权利纠纷解决指南的土地部长条例和 2015 年第 9 号土地和空间事务部关于 Adat 的公有土地权利任命程序的条例。法律社区和社区 位于某些地区,还有关于承认和保护 Adat 法律社区的法律草案。
更新日期:2016-12-29
down
wechat
bug