Searching and seizing voluminous data is a challenge that Indonesian law enforcement authorities should resolve. Indonesia does not have a comprehensive regime on personal data protection. The absence of a coherent legal framework on personal data protection does not negate the obligation of Indonesian law enforcement authorities to protect personal data of Indonesian subjects. However, the absence of the framework may lead to uncertainties or ambiguities on how the authorities should protect personal data. Against the uncertainties and ambiguities, Indonesian law enforcement authorities should resolve issues of voluminous data in obtaining e-information with the prevailing legislation. This article attempts to answer the question: how may Indonesian law enforcement authorities interpret the current law to establish a coherent legal framework to protect personal data in searching or seizing voluminous data? The interpretation is instrumental in supporting the development of the Indonesian regime on personal data protection. It proposes that the Indonesian criminal procedure law should emphasise the active role of the chief judges of competent district courts and should incorporate specificity and proportionality as conditions and safeguards in the execution of search and seizure of electronic evidence.

中文翻译：

---

在印度尼西亚刑事诉讼法中制定个人数据保护的法律框架

搜索和扣押大量数据是印度尼西亚执法当局应该解决的挑战。印度尼西亚没有关于个人数据保护的全面制度。缺乏关于个人数据保护的连贯法律框架并不否定印度尼西亚执法当局保护印度尼西亚主体个人数据的义务。然而，缺乏该框架可能会导致当局应如何保护个人数据的不确定性或含糊不清。针对不确定性和含糊不清的情况，印度尼西亚执法当局应根据现行立法解决获取电子信息时数据量大的问题。这篇文章试图回答这个问题：印度尼西亚执法当局如何解释现行法律，以建立一个连贯的法律框架，以在搜索或扣押大量数据时保护个人数据？该解释有助于支持印度尼西亚个人数据保护制度的发展。它建议印度尼西亚刑事诉讼法应强调主管地区法院首席法官的积极作用，并应将特殊性和相称性作为执行电子证据搜查和扣押的条件和保障。