We recently published a study of extended forensic child interviews in Norway which included a large sample (n = 207) of interviews with preschool‐aged children (Baugerud et al., 2020). Criticizing the study, Melinder, Magnusson, Ask, et al. (2020) make the bold assertion that: “when [the reader adopts] a different perspective and contextual knowledge [it] change the conclusions.” We were curious to read their reinterpretation of our findings but were left disappointed. Melinder et al.'s comments comprised a mixture of unsupported claims, factual errors, misrepresentations of the study and the Norwegian legal system, and mistaken assumptions about the coding practices we employed. In what follows, we address their comments and correct their errors, organized according to their own subheadings.

我们最近在挪威发表了一项关于扩大法医儿童访谈的研究，其中包括对学龄前儿童进行访谈的大量样本（n = 207）（Baugerud等，2020）。批评研究，梅林德，马格努森，问，等。（2020年）做出大胆的断言：“ [读者采用]不同的观点而上下文的知识[会]改变结论。” 我们很想读他们对我们发现的重新解释，但感到失望。Melinder等人的评论包括无根据的主张，事实错误，对研究和挪威法律制度的虚假陈述以及对我们采用的编码实践的错误假设。接下来，我们将根据他们自己的小标题处理他们的评论并纠正他们的错误。