This article compares the solar eclipse records in Fan Ye’s Hou Hanshu “Benji” 本紀to those in the Dongguan Hanji (225 CE), Sima Biao’s Xu Hanshu “Wuxing zhi” 五行志, Yuan Hong’s Hou Hanji, as well as Espenak and Meeus’ Five Millennium Canon of Solar Eclipses to comment upon the source, selection, reliability, and function of the eclipse records included in his imperial annals of the Eastern Han (25–220 CE). It finds that while Fan Ye stuck faithfully to the reliable observational record in the Xu Hanshu he at once replaced its interpretative apparatus of omenology with one of politico-ritual action for simple reasons of genre.

中文翻译：

---

没有意见

本文将范爷的侯汉书《本纪》的日食记录与东莞汉书（公元225年）、司马飚的徐汉书《五行志》、袁弘的侯汉书以及埃斯佩纳克和米乌斯的日食记录进行比较。五千年日食经典，以评论他的东汉（公元 25-220 年）帝国编年史中日食记录的来源、选择、可靠性和功能。它发现，虽然范爷忠实地坚持《徐寒书》中可靠的观察记录，但出于体裁的简单原因，他立即用一种政治仪式行动取代了其对预兆学的解释。