The aim of this article is to better understand the conditions outlined in the CILFIT judgment and their role in creating a meaningful dialogue about European Union law. For these purposes two distinct views on the relation between language and meaning are utilised, as has been argued for by Ludwig Wittgenstein in his Philosophical Investigations. In the CILFIT judgment both of these views surface, which imply different challenges to the participants of the EU dialogue. In the conclusion, we suggest how these challenges can be met in order to facilitate a mutually meaningful dialogue about EU law.

中文翻译：

---

如何继续就欧盟法律进行有意义的司法对话？从CILFIT判决的条件到建立新的欧洲法律文化

本文的目的是更好地理解CILFIT判决中概述的条件及其在就欧盟法律进行有意义的对话中的作用。为此，正如路德维希·维特根斯坦（Ludwig Wittgenstein）在其《哲学研究》中所主张的，对语言与意义之间的关系使用了两种截然不同的观点。在CILFIT判决中，这两种观点都浮出水面，这意味着欧盟对话参与者面临不同的挑战。最后，我们建议如何应对这些挑战，以促进关于欧盟法律的相互有意义的对话。