© L p i University-industry-government collaborations and relationships—as theorized by the Triple Helix model (Etzkowitz, and Zhou, 2018) among others—have been analyzed in a plethora of innovation, higher education and STS studies. Most of these studies have focused on national, regional, and institutional levels, examining the structures of interaction as well as the formal and informal linkages created in collaborations. More recent elaborations of the Triple Helix model have also pointed to the importance of society and societal actors beyond those institutionalized in universities, industry, and government. They emphasize the importance of integrating a perspective on the role of the media, publics, and civil society actors to understand innovation in knowledge economies. In recent debates, the concept of responsible research and innovation broadens the range of potential actors in innovation (Stilgoe et al. 2013, von Schomberg 2013). This asks for a deeper understanding of the characteristics of these actors as well as of the mechanisms by which they exert influence over institutional development. On the levels of organizations and organizational fields, existing literature on university-industry-government-society relationships has focused on the creation and institutionalization of technology transfer structures. A range of studies have explored the role of governments in setting up policies to facilitate interaction between university and industry, such as patenting regulation or sectoral policies for biotechnology or nanotechnology. The role of funding agencies promoting the interaction between university and industry has merited attention and has increased our understanding of the potentials and limitations of specific funding mechanisms. Significant work has emphasized the role of venture capitalists in promoting academic entrepreneurship. However, despite this plethora of studies, we still know very little about the locus and dynamics of agency when it comes to initiating change in university-industry-government-society interactions in innovation processes. Existing contributions on university-industry-government-society relationships are extremely useful to understand the drivers and processes of innovation in different countries. However, they mostly focus on the demand side, for example on the implementation of innovation policies via structural arrangements. The supply side of the story—the agency of knowledge producers not only in academia, industry, but also government and society—has to some extent been overlooked (Leišytė, 2018; Ranga and Etzkowitz 2013). Even though universities are understood as playing a crucial role

中文翻译：

---

《三重螺旋杂志》专题收藏：大学，行业，政府，社会关系的变革推动者

©L pi大学-工业-政府之间的合作和关系（根据Triple Helix模型（Etzkowitz和Zhou，2018年）推论）已在大量创新，高等教育和STS研究中进行了分析。这些研究大多数集中在国家，地区和机构级别，研究了互动的结构以及在协作中创建的正式和非正式联系。最近对“三重螺旋”模型的阐述也指出了社会和社会行为者的重要性，而不是大学，企业和政府中制度化的参与者。他们强调必须整合对媒体，公众和民间社会行为者的作用的观点，以理解知识经济中的创新。在最近的辩论中 负责任的研究和创新的概念拓宽了创新的潜在参与者范围（Stilgoe等，2013； von Schomberg，2013）。这要求对这些行为者的特征以及它们对制度发展施加影响的机制有更深入的了解。在组织和组织领域的层面上，关于大学-产业-政府-社会关系的现有文献集中于技术转让结构的建立和制度化。一系列研究探索了政府在制定政策以促进大学与产业之间互动方面的作用，例如专利法规或生物技术或纳米技术的部门政策。筹资机构促进大学与行业之间互动的作用值得关注，并增加了我们对特定筹资机制的潜力和局限性的理解。大量工作强调了风险资本家在促进学术创业中的作用。但是，尽管进行了大量的研究，但在启动创新过程中的大学，行业，政府，社会互动方面的变革时，我们对代理机构的所在地和动态仍然知之甚少。对大学，行业，政府，社会关系的现有贡献对于理解不同国家的创新动力和创新过程极为有用。但是，它们主要侧重于需求方，例如通过结构安排实施创新政策。故事的供应方-不仅是学术界，工业界，还包括政府和社会的知识生产者的代理机构-在某种程度上被忽视了（Leišytė，2018； Ranga和Etzkowitz，2013）。即使人们认为大学扮演着至关重要的角色