The number of papers emphasizing the importance of value creation and capture in ecosystems and collaborative networks has been growing. Especially, the growth has been more noticeable since 2016, with a 150 increase in papers published. However, the contributions are mainly fragmented, where scholars have addressed different themes involving ‘ecosystem value creation and capture’ (EVCC). Reasons for such fragmentation could include a lack of adequate understanding of the concepts in collaborative networks of innovative organizations (Chesbrough, et al., 2018), complexity of interactions in ecosystems (Ben Letaifa, 2014; Ritala & Almpanopoulou, 2017), and overall ambiguity in the exact structure of ecosystems (Ben Letaifa, 2014; Ritala & Gustafsson, 2018). Furthermore, as it pertains to collaborative networks of innovative firms, the concepts of ‘value creation’ and ‘value capture’ have been addressed with ambiguities regarding value perspectives (Chesbrough et al., 2018). Therefore, it is essential to comprehensively analyse EVCC in the academic literature. ‘Ecosystem’ is a metaphor from the field of ecology, suggested by Moore (1993) to describe the complex, dynamically changing, symbiotic relationships formed among a network of business organizations. ‘Value creation’ and ‘value capture’ have been debated conceptually in the fields of marketing, strategic management, industrial organizations, and business models (Chesbrough et al., 2018; Pitelis, 2009). The ‘ecosystem value creation’ process is regarded as a mechanism for collaboration and activities within an ecosystem to create value for customers and users (Hannu Tuomisaari et al., 2013). ‘Ecosystem value capture’ refers to firm-level strategic plans that appropriate their share of the total value created by an ecosystem (Hannu Tuomisaari et al., 2013), be it captured purposely or serendipitously (Radziwon, et al., 2017; Ritala et al., 2013). EVCC is an integral part of ecosystem business models (Ceccagnoli et al., 2012) and the sustainability of ecosystems (Chesbrough et al., 2018). It serves to dynamically monitor contributions of actors to the proposed collective value, while determining their share of the total appropriated value.

中文翻译：

---

生态系统价值创造和捕获：文献和潜在研究机会的系统回顾

强调在生态系统和协作网络中创造和获取价值的重要性的论文数量一直在增加。尤其是2016年以来的增长更为明显，发表论文增加了150篇。然而，这些贡献主要是零散的，学者们讨论了涉及“生态系统价值创造和捕获”（EVCC）的不同主题。造成这种分裂的原因可能包括对创新组织协作网络中的概念缺乏足够的理解（Chesbrough 等人，2018 年）、生态系统中相互作用的复杂性（Ben Letaifa，2014 年；Ritala 和 Almpanopoulou，2017 年），以及总体而言生态系统确切结构的模糊性（Ben Letaifa，2014 年；Ritala 和 Gustafsson，2018 年）。此外，由于它涉及创新公司的协作网络，“价值创造”和“价值捕获”的概念在价值观点方面存在歧义（Chesbrough 等，2018）。因此，有必要对学术文献中的 EVCC 进行综合分析。“生态系统”是来自生态学领域的一个隐喻，由 Moore (1993) 建议用来描述在商业组织网络之间形成的复杂的、动态变化的、共生关系。“价值创造”和“价值获取”在营销、战略管理、行业组织和商业模式等领域一直在概念上争论不休（Chesbrough 等，2018 年；Pitelis，2009 年）。“生态系统价值创造”过程被视为生态系统内为客户和用户创造价值的协作和活动机制（Hannu Tuomisaari 等，2013）。“生态系统价值捕获”是指公司层面的战略计划，它们在生态系统创造的总价值中占有份额（Hannu Tuomisaari 等人，2013 年），无论是有意还是偶然捕获（Radziwon 等人，2017 年；Ritala等人，2013 年）。EVCC 是生态系统商业模式（Ceccagnoli 等，2012）和生态系统可持续性（Chesbrough 等，2018）不可或缺的一部分。它用于动态监控参与者对提议的集体价值的贡献，同时确定他们在总分配价值中的份额。, 2012) 和生态系统的可持续性 (Chesbrough et al., 2018)。它用于动态监控参与者对提议的集体价值的贡献，同时确定他们在总分配价值中的份额。, 2012) 和生态系统的可持续性 (Chesbrough et al., 2018)。它用于动态监控参与者对提议的集体价值的贡献，同时确定他们在总分配价值中的份额。