This paper applies the three logics of public authority – the political marketplace, moral populism and civicness – to the case of Afghanistan in 2001–2013. It shows how the logic of the political marketplace offers an apt interpretation of the Karzai regime, while the logic of moral populism is more relevant as a way of categorizing the Taliban. Based on a civil society dialogue project, the paper discusses the way that civil society actors characterize the situation and envisage a logic of civicness. The paper argues that the mutually reinforcing nature of the two dominant logics explains pervasive and rising insecurity that has been exacerbated by external interventions. The implication of the argument is that security requires a different logic of authority that could underpin legitimate and inclusive institutions.

中文翻译：

---

公共权力的逻辑：理解阿富汗的权力、政治和安全，2002-2014

本文将公共权威的三种逻辑——政治市场、道德民粹主义和公民性——应用于 2001 年至 2013 年的阿富汗案例。它展示了政治市场的逻辑如何为卡尔扎伊政权提供了恰当的解释，而道德民粹主义的逻辑更适合作为对塔利班进行分类的一种方式。本文以公民社会对话项目为基础，讨论了公民社会行为者描述情况和设想公民逻辑的方式。该论文认为，这两种主导逻辑的相辅相成的性质解释了外部干预加剧了普遍且不断上升的不安全感。该论点的含义是，安全需要一种不同的权威逻辑，它可以支撑合法和包容的机构。