The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is an international treaty that aims to promote, protect and ensure the rights of persons with disabilities so that they can fully participate in society and enjoy the same freedoms and opportunities as others. It provides an important framework for the inclusion of persons with disabilities with the help of Assistive Technologies (AT). This paper assesses and compares the implementation of the CRPD with regards to the availability of AT in four countries (Germany, Hungary, Portugal and Sweden), which to some extent represent different European regions. The paper is based on a review of relevant academic literature, the DOTCOM database and regulatory documents as well as on five validation interviews with national experts. In the countries studied, anti-discriminatory and other legislation is included at the highest level of the legal framework and contains detailed rules on definitions, remedies and legal procedures. There are specific prohibitions in several fields, such as employment, housing, and healthcare. Nonetheless, there are still cases of non-compliance with the CRPD and of laws and regulations which discriminate against persons with a disability. Additionally, there are great variations between countries. As very positive examples of favourable regulatory frameworks for furthering inclusion with the help of ATs do exist, there may be benefit in raising awareness of such examples to support other countries in developing their own measures.

中文翻译：

---

联合国《残疾人权利公约》的执行情况：四个欧洲国家在辅助技术方面的比较

《联合国残疾人权利公约》（CRPD）是一项旨在促进，保护和确保残疾人权利的国际条约，以使他们能够充分参与社会并享有与他人一样的自由和机会。它为借助辅助技术（AT）的残疾人融合提供了重要的框架。本文就四个国家（德国，匈牙利，葡萄牙和瑞典）中AT的可用性评估和比较了CRPD的实施情况，这些国家在一定程度上代表了欧洲不同地区。本文基于对相关学术文献，DOTCOM数据库和法规文件的审查，以及与国家专家进行的五次验证性访谈。在所研究的国家中，法律框架的最高级别包括了反歧视和其他立法，其中包含有关定义，补救措施和法律程序的详细规则。在就业，住房和医疗保健等多个领域中都有具体的禁令。尽管如此，仍然存在不遵守《残疾人权利公约》和歧视残疾人的法律法规的情况。此外，国家之间存在很大差异。由于确实存在有利的监管框架，可以在AT的帮助下进一步促进包容性，因此提高对此类实例的认识以支持其他国家制定自己的措施可能会有所益处。救济和法律程序。在就业，住房和医疗保健等多个领域中都有具体的禁止规定。尽管如此，仍然存在不遵守《残疾人权利公约》和歧视残疾人的法律法规的情况。此外，国家之间存在很大差异。由于确实存在有利的监管框架，可以在AT的帮助下进一步促进包容性，因此提高对此类实例的认识以支持其他国家制定自己的措施可能会有所益处。救济和法律程序。在就业，住房和医疗保健等多个领域中都有具体的禁令。尽管如此，仍然存在不遵守《残疾人权利公约》和歧视残疾人的法律法规的情况。此外，国家之间存在很大差异。由于确实存在有利的监管框架，可以在AT的帮助下进一步促进包容性，因此提高对此类实例的认识以支持其他国家制定自己的措施可能会有所益处。各国之间差异很大。由于确实存在有利的监管框架，可以在AT的帮助下进一步促进包容性，因此提高对此类实例的认识以支持其他国家制定自己的措施可能会有所益处。各国之间差异很大。由于确实存在有利的监管框架，可以在AT的帮助下进一步促进包容性，因此提高对此类实例的认识以支持其他国家制定自己的措施可能会有所益处。