Building on the companion piece by Christine Parker and Hope Johnson on international instruments supporting holistic dietary guidelines, this article examines potential concerns raised by such guidelines under international trade law and international investment law. Drawing lessons from the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (‘WHO FCTC’) and its relevance to recent disputes in international economic law, this article examines the role of international instruments in supporting domestic dietary guidelines that could be challenged in the dispute settlement system of the World Trade Organization (‘WTO’) or under investor-state dispute settlement. The article includes an assessment of the potential impact of international economic laws on holistic dietary guidelines and related regulatory interventions, as well as a discussion of how a WHO treaty on healthy and sustainable diets could influence the interpretation and application of key trade and investment provisions. The article concludes that holistic dietary guidelines can be implemented in a manner consistent with international economic law, at least if local products are not prioritised.

中文翻译：

---

可持续健康食品的选择：饮食指南和国际经济法

在克里斯汀·帕克（Christine Parker）和霍普·约翰逊（Hope Johnson）关于支持整体饮食指南的国际文书的配套文章的基础上，本文研究了此类指南根据国际贸易法和国际投资法提出的潜在问题。本文从《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》（《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》）及其与国际经济法中近期争端的相关性中吸取了教训，探讨了国际文书在支持可能在争端解决中受到挑战的国内饮食指南中的作用。世界贸易组织（WTO）的系统或处于投资者与国家之间的争端解决之下。本文包括对国际经济法对整体饮食指南和相关监管干预措施的潜在影响的评估，以及关于世界卫生组织关于健康和可持续饮食的条约如何影响关键贸易和投资条款的解释和应用的讨论。文章得出结论，至少在不优先考虑本地产品的情况下，可以以与国际经济法一致的方式实施整体饮食指南。