Open Education gained more visibility as a result of the emergence of Open Educational Resources (OER) and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). This article discusses whether MOOCs should be considered as OER. Open Education and OER can be treated as two strands with different historical roots even though, in theory, OER are an aspect of Open Education. Different OER definitions and typologies are analyzed in relation to their dimensions and categorizations. Furthermore, the four conditions and two original categories of MOOCs are discussed, leading to a debate on their quality. It turns out that there are two perspectives on MOOCs: from an OER perspective, MOOCs as a product can be called OER. From an Open Education perspective, MOOCs are going beyond OER as enablers of Open Education and are understood as an innovative way of changing education. These perspectives are reflected by the OpenEd Quality Framework. The short answer to our leading question is: sometimes, and it depends on your perspective.

中文翻译：

---

MOOC是开放式教育资源吗？关于OER和MOOC的历史，定义和类型的文献综述

由于开放教育资源（OER）和大规模开放在线课程（MOOC）的出现，开放教育获得了更大的知名度。本文讨论了是否应将MOOC视为OER。尽管从理论上讲，开放教育是开放教育的一个方面，但开放教育和开放式教育资源可以被视为具有不同历史渊源的两个方面。分析了不同的OER定义和类型及其尺寸和分类。此外，讨论了MOOC的四个条件和两个原始类别，从而引发了关于其质量的争论。事实证明，有关MOOC的观点有两种：从OER的角度来看，MOOC作为产品可以称为OER。从开放教育的角度来看，MOOC已超越OER成为开放教育的推动者，并被视为改变教育的创新方式。这些观点反映在OpenEd质量框架中。对我们的主要问题的简短回答是：有时，这取决于您的观点。