Abstract The problem of the relation and difference between things and objects is one of the most decisive issues for the conception of the real. These words are usually used interchangeably – and not only in their everyday usage. There are some contemporary philosophical positions that consider almost “everything” as an object; on the other hand, there are proponents of a strict separation of objects and things. How did it happen that the concept of thing (res) and object (obiectum) not only began to theoretically “compete” with each other but also sometimes came to represent differently conceived realities, and even occasionally came to represent an identical conception of reality? This article, on the one hand, discusses the philosophical strategies that reveal the difference between objects and things and enable such a conception of reality which takes into account the Kantian distinction between Realität and Wirklichkeit. On the other, it reconstructs Giorgio Agamben’s project of modal ontology. Agamben’s take on the question What is real? is oriented toward the modus of being and could be traced back to the recognition of the difference between objects and things as well as the “restoration of the life of things themselves.”

中文翻译：

---

现实与模态本体问题

摘要物与物之间的关系和差异问题是对实在概念最决定性的问题之一。这些单词通常可以互换使用-不仅是日常使用。在当代一些哲学立场上，几乎把“一切”都当作一个对象。另一方面，有人主张严格分离物体和事物。事物（res）和客体（obiectum）的概念不仅在理论上开始“竞争”，而且有时代表不同的概念现实，甚至偶尔代表相同的现实概念，这是怎么发生的？一方面，这篇文章 讨论了揭示对象和事物之间差异的哲学策略，并提出了这样一种现实概念，其中考虑了Realität和Wirklichkeit之间的康德式区分。另一方面，它重构了Giorgio Agamben的模态本体论项目。阿甘本对这个问题的看法是什么？是针对存在方式的，可以追溯到对物体与事物之间差异的认识以及“事物本身生命的恢复”。阿甘本对这个问题的看法是什么？是针对存在方式的，可以追溯到对物体与事物之间差异的认识以及“事物本身生命的恢复”。阿甘本对这个问题的看法是什么？是针对存在方式的，可以追溯到对物体与事物之间差异的认识以及“事物本身生命的恢复”。