Australia has arguably benefited from its market based regulatory system and progressed toward its first objective of an entrepreneurial wealth creating society competing with its global peers; the second objective, being investment stability and risk mitigation, has for many people been an abject disaster. Proposed reforms to balance entrepreneurial market conduct with investor and beneficiary risk mitigation rely on themes established by Cooper (personal liability of superannuation trustee directors), Heydon (elimination of unhealthy culture), Hayne (confluence of law and morality) and the Productivity Commission (trust). The Australian government must act. It must do so strategically. It must establish the nexus between the intent of the law and its practical implementation for those it purports to serve. Parliament has yet to debate these underlying causes. If it does, then it must confront the distinction between fiduciary and non-fiduciary duties and recognise the power of fiduciary law. Confused parliamentary leadership has facilitated corruption of the regulatory system. These are philosophical as well as legal questions. Hayne points to the need for a framework for the re-integration of the intent and spirit of the law with its statutory manifestations. This paper is that framework.

中文翻译：

---

实证分析支持海恩长期改革论文

可以说，澳大利亚受益于其基于市场的监管体系，并朝着其第一个目标——创业财富创造社会与全球同行竞争；第二个目标，即投资稳定和风险缓解，对许多人来说是一场灾难。平衡创业市场行为与投资者和受益人风险缓解的拟议改革依赖于 Cooper（退休金受托人董事的个人责任）、Heydon（消除不健康文化）、Hayne（法律与道德的融合）和生产力委员会（信托）。澳大利亚政府必须采取行动。它必须战略性地这样做。它必须在法律的意图与其旨在服务的对象的实际实施之间建立联系。议会尚未就这些根本原因进行辩论。如果是这样，那么它必须面对信托义务和非信托义务之间的区别，并承认信托法的权力。混乱的议会领导层助长了监管体系的腐败。这些是哲学问题，也是法律问题。海恩指出需要一个框架来重新整合法律的意图和精神与其法定表现形式。这篇论文就是那个框架。海恩指出需要一个框架来重新整合法律的意图和精神与其法定表现形式。这篇论文就是那个框架。海恩指出需要一个框架来重新整合法律的意图和精神与其法定表现形式。这篇论文就是那个框架。