ABSTRACT This comment piece analyses the Supreme Court decision in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd. The case is an important source of principle on the availability of injunctive relief where the private information at stake becomes widely known. Despite this, the decision is a missed opportunity to clarify some of the key controversies within the misuse of private information jurisprudence. Specifically, the Court might have done more to clarify the nature and meaning of the enigmatic ‘freedom to criticise’ doctrine. The decision also adopts a controversial approach concerning the adequacy of damages where wealthy claimants are involved.

中文翻译：

---

隐私和紧急入侵原则

摘要该评论文章分析了PJS诉News Group Newspapers Ltd.最高法院的判决。该案是获得禁令性救济的重要原则依据，在这种情况下，所涉及的私人信息已广为人知。尽管如此，该决定还是错过了一个机会，以澄清滥用私人信息法理学中的一些关键争议。具体而言，法院可能在澄清神秘的“自由批评”学说的性质和含义上做得更多。该决定还采用了有争议的方法，涉及富裕索赔人所涉及的损害赔偿是否足够。