ABSTRACT This article considers whether newspapers should be under a requirement to notify subjects of stories which contain private information. The events of Mosley v UK provide the basis of discussion. The arguments for and against a pre-notification requirement are critically examined and the practical considerations of implementing the requirement are analysed. A few solutions to the problem of protecting privacy when newspapers want to publish private information are then discussed. It is considered that pre-publication notification is necessary to ensure that the privacy rights of subjects of stories are protected. Pre-publication notification will allow individuals to apply for interim injunctions and ensure that the story remains private. However, given the practical problems involved in implementing such a requirement, it is concluded that a pre-publication notification requirement will not be introduced for the foreseeable future.

中文翻译：

---

平衡私人生活权和言论自由：出版前的通知是前进的方向吗？

摘要本文考虑是否应要求报纸将含有私人信息的报道告知主题。Mosley诉UK一案提供了讨论的基础。对支持和反对预先通知要求的论据进行了严格审查，并分析了实现该要求的实际考虑。然后讨论了一些在报纸要发布私人信息时保护隐私的问题的解决方案。人们认为，发布前通知对于确保故事主题的隐私权受到保护是必要的。发布前的通知将允许个人申请临时禁令，并确保故事保持私密性。但是，考虑到实施此要求涉及的实际问题，