Aim. The aim of this study is to analyse the conducted studies in order to reveal the effect of the strategies, methods and techniques used in elementary school mathematics courses, to apply critical strategies based on impartiality, and to critically evaluate and synthesize them. Methods. In this systematic review study, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement was used in order to prepare the systematic review protocol. The studies were based on students’ achievement resulting from student-centred strategy, methods and techniques. Results. The results of the study show that the number of participants of the primary studies centred on the range of 31- 60 to 90 and above. Moreover, the total number of studies conducted in different countries constitutes a significant proportion of the studies included. In most of the studies (f=87), significant differences were found in favour of the experimental group. Conclusion. Within the framework of the inclusion criteria of the research, it can be concluded that student-centred strategy methods and techniques statistically change the students' mathematics achievement. Among these methods and techniques, Realistic Mathematics Education, Computer Assisted Teaching Method, and Collaborative Learning Method were prominent.

中文翻译：

---

对提高数学成就的方法的系统评价

目标。本研究的目的是分析所进行的研究，以揭示小学数学课程中使用的策略，方法和技术的效果，应用基于公正性的批判策略，并对它们进行批判性评估和综合。方法。在此系统评价研究中，使用了系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA）声明来准备系统评价方案。这些研究是基于以学生为中心的策略，方法和技术所取得的学生成绩。结果。研究结果表明，主要研究的参与者人数集中在31-60至90及以上的范围内。此外，在不同国家进行的研究总数占所纳入研究的很大一部分。在大多数研究中（f = 87），发现对实验组有利的显着差异。结论。在研究纳入标准的框架内，可以得出结论，以学生为中心的策略方法和技术会在统计学上改变学生的数学成绩。在这些方法和技术中，写实数学教育，计算机辅助教学法和协作学习法是突出的。