This paper aims to study the FinTech enterprises and the management theories related to this subject in a scientific way.,This study is a bibliometric study on FinTech enterprises. Its origin is a survey of 1,749 papers in 6 traditional peer-reviewed academic databases (e.g. Science Direct and Scopus) and in the “gray” literature, published by other agents and not subject to double-blind peer review. In this analysis we use three approaches: academic paper or not; journal main interest, and main purpose of the paper.,The first approach shows 45% of papers without blind review. The second approach shows no concentration on any journal. It represents no concentration on any kind of specific journal. And the third approach shows four kinds of contents in all researched papers: FinTech categorizations; FinTech related to theory of disruptive innovation; FinTech and theories of administration or economy; and finally, FinTech and regulatory and legislative aspects.,The findings identified the emergence of new research strands, precedence of studies of “gray” literature to explain the phenomenon, distribution of studies in different fields of knowledge (e.g. information technology, business and law) and lack of consensus in theories to explain the matter.

中文翻译：

---

金融领域的学术生产和技术兴起

本文旨在以科学的方式研究金融科技企业及其相关的管理理论。本研究是对金融科技企业的文献计量研究。它的起源是对6个传统的经过同行评审的学术数据库（例如，Science Direct和Scopus）以及“灰色”文献中的1,749篇论文进行的调查，这些文献由其他代理商发表，并且未经双盲同行评审。在此分析中，我们使用三种方法：是否采用学术论文；采用何种方法？杂志的主要兴趣和论文的主要目的。，第一种方法显示了45％的论文未经盲目审阅。第二种方法显示没有集中在任何日记帐上。它不代表任何一种特定的期刊。第三种方法显示了所有已研究论文的四种内容：金融科技分类；与破坏性创新理论有关的金融科技；金融科技与行政或经济理论；研究结果确定了新的研究领域的出现，解释这种现象的“灰色”文学研究的优先次序，不同知识领域（例如信息技术，商业和法律）的研究分布。 ），并且在理论上缺乏解释该问题的共识。