当前位置: X-MOL 学术Empirical Musicology Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Aesthetic Experience Explained by the Affect-Space Framework
Empirical Musicology Review ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2017-04-25 , DOI: 10.18061/emr.v11i3-4.5115
Emery Schubert , Adrian C. North , David J. Hargreaves

A framework for organizing the semantic structure of aesthetic experience is proposed. The new framework is presented in an 'affect-space' and consists of three sets of dichotomous classifications: (1) internal locus (the felt experience) versus external locus (the description of the object), (2) 'affect-valence' — the attraction to (positive valence, e.g. preference, awe) or repulsion from (negative valence, e.g. hatred, disgust) the artwork/object — versus 'emotion-valence' — the character/contemplation of an emotion (happiness-an example of positive valence, sadness-an example of negative valence), and (3) deep versus shallow hedonic tone—e.g. 'awe' is deep, 'preference' is shallow. Deep hedonic tone is proposed as a better index of aesthetic experience (awe, being moved etc.) than shallow hedonic tone (preference, pleasure, enjoyment). Deep, internal locus, affect-valence during the contemplation of an object amenable to an aesthetic judgement (beautiful, ugly etc.) presents the necessary and sufficient conditions for an aesthetic experience. The framework allows future researchers to consider which aspects of an experience come closest to actual aesthetic experience from an empirical aesthetics perspective. It also highlights the limited value in grouping together so many aesthetic experiences under the rubric of emotion, such as aesthetic emotions, preference, basic emotions and so forth. Our framework paves the way for testing and further development of theory on aesthetic experience.

中文翻译:

情感空间框架解释的审美体验

提出了一种组织审美经验语义结构的框架。新框架在“影响空间”中表示,由三组两分类组成:(1)内部场所(感觉体验)与外部场所(对象的描述),(2)“影响价” -对艺术品/物体的吸引(正价,例如偏好,敬畏)或排斥(负价,例如仇恨,厌恶)-与“情感价”-情感的性格/沉思(幸福-一个例子)正价,悲伤(负价的一个示例),以及(3)浅享乐与浅享乐之间的对比-例如,“敬畏”是深沉的,“偏好”是浅沉的。深享乐主义被认为是更好的审美体验指标(敬畏,被感动等)。),而不是浅浅的享乐主义(偏好,愉悦,享受)。在考虑要进行美学判断(美丽,丑陋等)的对象时,深层的内部场所,情感价为审美体验提供了必要和充分的条件。该框架允许未来的研究人员从经验美学的角度考虑体验的哪些方面最接近实际的审美体验。它还强调了在情感专栏下将如此多的美学体验(例如审美情感,偏好,基本情感等)组合在一起的价值有限。我们的框架为审美经验理论的测试和进一步发展铺平了道路。在考虑要进行审美判断(美丽,丑陋等)的对象时的情感价为审美体验提供了必要和充分的条件。该框架允许未来的研究人员从经验美学的角度考虑体验的哪些方面最接近实际的审美体验。它还强调了在情感专栏下将如此多的美学体验(例如审美情感,偏好,基本情感等)组合在一起的价值有限。我们的框架为审美经验理论的测试和进一步发展铺平了道路。在考虑要进行审美判断(美丽,丑陋等)的对象时的情感价为审美体验提供了必要和充分的条件。该框架允许未来的研究人员从经验美学的角度考虑体验的哪些方面最接近实际的审美体验。它还强调了在情感专栏下将如此多的美学体验(例如审美情感,偏好,基本情感等)组合在一起的价值有限。我们的框架为审美经验理论的测试和进一步发展铺平了道路。该框架允许未来的研究人员从经验美学的角度考虑体验的哪些方面最接近实际的审美体验。它还强调了在情感专栏下将如此多的美学体验(例如审美情感,偏好,基本情感等)组合在一起的价值有限。我们的框架为审美经验理论的测试和进一步发展铺平了道路。该框架允许未来的研究人员从经验美学角度考虑体验的哪些方面最接近实际的审美体验。它还强调了在情感专栏下将如此多的美学体验(例如审美情感,偏好,基本情感等)组合在一起的价值有限。我们的框架为审美经验理论的测试和进一步发展铺平了道路。
更新日期:2017-04-25
down
wechat
bug