Based on a turn to the rational human subject in Descartes, Kant and Feuerbach, this paper critically examines four efforts at shaping sustainability discourse: the definition of sustainability in Our common future; stewardship Christian theology; forms of partisan justice; and GDP as measure of economic growth. These efforts made certain advances, but because they share the underlying anthropocentric bias of Western philosophy, they fail to step out of the current sustainability paradigm. The paper closes with two suggestions of how to de-centre the human subject and to build a network-view of all species.

中文翻译：

---

我们能否克服可持续发展话语中的人类中心主义偏见？

在转向笛卡尔，康德和费尔巴哈的理性人类主题的基础上，本文批判性地考察了塑造可持续性话语的四项努力：我们共同未来的可持续性定义；管教基督教神学；党派司法的形式；GDP作为经济增长的指标。这些努力取得了一定的进展，但是由于它们具有西方哲学的潜在的以人为本的偏见，因此他们无法脱离当前的可持续性范式。最后，本文提出了两个建议，即如何以人类为主体并建立所有物种的网络视图。