ABSTRACT

This essay is concerned with an enigmatic passage at the heart of Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition which locates the origin of ideas in an “aleatory point”. Deleuze develops this claim through a series of allusions, some to Henry Corbin’s 1938 translation of Heidegger, others to the work of Maurice Blanchot. This essay reconstructs the context of those allusion, showing that Deleuze developed his central concepts by reworking Heidegger’s reflections on transcendence and Blanchot’s elaboration of a post-Hegelian form of transcendence. Deleuze’s thought in the late 60s, then, should be read as an intervention in postwar attempts to articulate a Hegel-Heidegger synthesis by determining the nature and structure of transcendence. Ultimately, the essay concludes, the origin of ideas in Difference and Repetition must be understood as a particular form of negation: the non-being or the ?-being by which thought transcends the given.

摘要

这篇文章关注的是吉尔·德勒兹的《差异与重复》核心的一个神秘段落，该段落将思想的起源定位在一个“偶然点”中。德勒兹通过一系列典故发展了这一主张，其中一些典故是亨利·科尔宾 1938 年对海德格尔的翻译，其他的则是莫里斯·布朗肖的作品。本文重构了这些典故的语境，表明德勒兹通过重新审视海德格尔对超越的反思和布朗肖对后黑格尔超越形式的阐述，发展了他的中心概念。那么，德勒兹在 60 年代后期的思想应该被解读为对战后试图通过确定超越的本质和结构来阐明黑格尔-海德格尔综合的干预。最后，文章总结道，思想的起源差异和重复必须被理解为一种特殊的否定形式：思想超越给定的非存在或?-存在。