ABSTRACT In 1939 Martin Heidegger made the astonishing claim that the overcoming of the beyng of machination occurs in T. E. Lawrence's Seven Pillars of Wisdom. He arrived at this assessment in the course of his attempt to distance himself from Friedrich Nietzsche and Ernst Jünger. It is well known that Heidegger formulated his understanding of machination in part in response to Jünger's account of total mobilization, but the importance for Heidegger of Jünger's accounts of his experiences at the Front also needs to be recognized. Lawrence presented Heidegger with a very different response to a different kind of war from that of Jünger. This paper highlights some passages in Seven Pillars that help to explain what led Heidegger to believe that Lawrence provided a model of how to avoid some of the pitfalls of Nietzsche's and Jünger's attempts to overcome metaphysics.

中文翻译：

---

克服机械时代的挑战：海德格尔，詹格和TE劳伦斯

摘要1939年，马丁·海德格尔（Martin Heidegger）提出了惊人的主张，即在TE劳伦斯（La Lawrence）的《智慧的七大支柱》（Sevens of Wisdom）中克服了机械化的挑战。在试图与弗里德里希·尼采和恩斯特·扬格保持距离的过程中，他做出了这一评估。众所周知，海德格尔对骗子的表述部分是为了回应詹格对全面动员的描述，但对于詹德描述其在前线的经历对海德格尔的重要性也需要得到承认。劳伦斯向海德格尔提出了与詹格不同类型的战争非常不同的反应。本文重点介绍了《七大支柱》中的一些段落，这些段落有助于解释是什么使海德格尔认为劳伦斯提供了一个模型，该模型避免了尼采的某些陷阱。