The last decades have been marked by the extensive Europeanisation of conflict of laws rules. Traditionally, national conflict of laws rules in Continental Europe were aimed at determining the closest connection between the legal relation and the putatively applicable law. This universal objective was often combined with more local objectives: the achievement of certain substantive policies of the forum through conflictual mechanisms. The Europeanisation of conflict of laws rules poses a legitimate question: do EU conflict of laws rules pursue identical or similar policies as national conflict of laws rules? The issue may be approached using different methods. One approach is inductive – the analysis of conflict of laws rules found in EU secondary law and their comparison with national conflict of laws rules. Another approach is deductive – the analysis of the Treaty basis for EU conflict of laws rules, in order to identify whether this constitutional framework prescribes certain policies that may be different from those used in national conflict of laws rules. This contribution is devoted to the second method and analyses whether the recognition clause found in Article 81 TFEU has any meaningful influence on the nature and scope of EU conflict of law rules.

中文翻译：

---

TFEU​​的第81（1）条承认条款对欧盟法律冲突规则的含义

在过去的几十年中，以广泛的法律冲突欧洲化为标志。传统上，欧洲大陆的国家法律冲突规则旨在确定法律关系与公认的适用法律之间的最紧密联系。这个普遍目标常常与更多地方目标结合在一起：通过冲突机制实现论坛的某些实质性政策。法律冲突规则的欧洲化提出了一个合理的问题：欧盟法律冲突规则是否遵循与国家法律冲突规则相同或相似的政策？可以使用不同的方法来解决此问题。一种方法是归纳法-分析欧盟二级法中的法律冲突规则，并将其与国家法律冲突规则进行比较。另一种方法是演绎法–分析欧盟法律冲突规则的条约基础，以便确定此宪法框架是否规定了某些政策，这些政策可能与国家法律冲突规则所采用的政策不同。该贡献致力于第二种方法，并分析了TFEU第81条中的承认条款是否对欧盟法律冲突规则的性质和范围产生了有意义的影响。