Regulatory rules are omnipresent today. Increasingly, they also influence private rights and obligations, from employment contracts to competition law and data protection. Private international law traditionally treats them with a certain reserve because they do not fit its paradigms of “neutral” and “interchangeable” rules of law. This article argues that it is time to change this attitude. Regulatory rules often protect global public goods, such as the environment, or shield against global bads, such as pandemics. Others serve aims shared between different countries, like the fight against money laundering and tax evasion. For these reasons, administrative authorities around the world cooperate in the enforcement of regulation. Private international law should open up its methodology to this new reality. After exploring the traditional ways in which regulation has been dealt with, this article makes concrete proposals for changes. Besides overcoming the “public law taboo”, these include the more liberal application of foreign public law and foreign overriding mandatory rules, the development of multilateral conflicts rules for areas permeated by regulation, the recognition of foreign administrative decisions, and the development of a global public policy.

中文翻译：

---

监管，全球治理和国际私法：对三角形进行平方

如今，监管规则无处不在。从雇佣合同到竞争法和数据保护，它们也越来越多地影响着私人权利和义务。传统上，国际私法对他们有一定的保留，因为它们不符合其“中立”和“可互换”的法律规则范式。本文认为，是时候改变这种态度了。监管规则通常会保护全球公共物品（例如环境），或防止全球不良事件（例如流行病）。其他服务于不同国家之间共享的目标，例如打击洗钱和逃税的斗争。由于这些原因，世界各地的行政当局都在执行法规方面进行合作。国际私法应向新现实开放其方法。在探索了处理监管的传统方式之后，本文提出了一些具体的改革建议。除了克服“公法禁忌”之外，这些还包括更自由地适用外国公法和外国压倒性的强制性规则，为法规所渗透的领域制定多边冲突规则，承认外国行政决定，以及发展全球化。公共政策。