Private International Law (PIL) does not admit patrimony, usually considered as the totality of the property rights of a person, as an autonomous legal category. Whereas, within civil law systems influenced by Roman Law, at the domestic or internal level, patrimony is a recognised legal concept. But, actually, this unitary vision seems less and less stable owing to the adoption, within said systems, of some types of negotiable instruments that are able to realise different forms of patrimonies. This article intends to underline how civil law systems are gradually affirming a divisional approach about the regulation of patrimony, as traditionally happens at the level of PIL rules. But at the same time, it aims at highlighting how, in particular, by recourse to the use of trusts, it is possible to recover both at the PIL and internal levels a unitary vision.

中文翻译：

---

大陆法系内部对继承权的管理：从单一法到分割法管理遗产财产及其对私法规则的影响

国际私法（PIL）不允许将继承权（通常被视为个人财产权的全部）作为自治法律类别。在受罗马法影响的民法体系内，在国内或国内，继承权是公认的法律概念。但是，实际上，由于在所述系统内采用了能够实现不同形式的遗产的某些类型的可流通票据，这种统一的愿景似乎越来越不稳定。本文旨在强调民法体系如何逐步确认关于遗产管理的分案方式，这在传统上是在公益诉讼规则层面上发生的。但与此同时，它的目的是强调特别是如何通过使用信任来实现，