当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Private International Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The EU Succession Regulation and forced heirship: a potential violation of German public policy?
Journal of Private International Law ( IF 0.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-03 , DOI: 10.1080/17441048.2020.1760469
Dorota Miler

The author examines whether the application of foreign law on forced heirship as specified by the EU Succession Regulation could lead to a violation of German public policy and thus trigger the application of Article 35 of the Regulation on public policy. Particularly, the author explores whether and under what conditions this could happen if the law of another EU Member State, which allows deprivation of forced heirship under circumstances that are not deemed sufficient pursuant to German law, is applicable to a deceased's succession. The problem of a potential violation of public policy due to the application of foreign law on forced heirship is especially significant in Germany due to the (unusual) constitutional protection that attaches to an entitlement to forced heirship and due to the large number of foreigners living in the jurisdiction. The article considers the relevant provisions of the EU Succession Regulation, German public policy doctrine, and the law on deprivation of forced heirship in selected EU Member States.

中文翻译:

欧盟继承法规和强制继承权:是否可能违反德国的公共政策?

作者研究了欧盟继承条例中有关强制继承的外国法律的适用是否可能导致违反德国公共政策,从而触发了公共法规实施细则第35条的适用。特别是,作者探讨了如果另一个欧盟成员国的法律适用于死者的继承权,那么该欧盟成员国的法律允许在根据德国法律被认为不足的情况下剥夺强迫继承权,是否会在何种情况下发生?由于在强制性继承权上附加了(不寻常的)宪法保护,并且由于居住在该国的外国人数量众多,在德国,由于适用外国法律而对强迫性继承产生潜在的违反公共政策的问题尤为严重。管辖权。本文考虑了《欧盟继任规定》,德国公共政策学说以及有关在某些欧盟成员国内剥夺强迫继承权的法律的相关规定。
更新日期:2020-05-03
down
wechat
bug