The main hypothesis of this paper states that the frontier does not constitute a structural feature of the Iberian societies in the twelfth century. Conversely, it results from a time-limited process, and thereby traditional ideas according to which the frontier was a physical and social space where a particular society was created and long-term cultural exchanges took place are wrong and based on a historiographical assumption rather than verified evidence. This work develops the argument that growing feudal states could not tolerate fluid and extended borders in social and temporal terms. This was the case in the Ebro Valley and its Iberian edges. Between 1080 and 1130, the conquest destroys the foundations of the taifa sultanates, and disrupts the Andalusian society. Thereupon, between 1150 and 1190, the Catalan-aragonese sovereigns impose in border territories, and their aristocratic competitors miss the opportunity to begin the thirteenth century consolidating big autonomous or semi-autonomous domains, with the relative exception of Albarracin. This paper studies the way in which this entrenchment of the Catalan-aragonese state took place and impeded the consolidation of a “border society”.

中文翻译：

---

弗朗特里亚·埃斯塔多·封建时期的阿拉贡·加泰罗尼亚·杜兰特·西格罗十二世

本文的主要假设指出，边界并不构成十二世纪伊比利亚社会的结构特征。相反，它是由时间限制的过程导致的，因此传统观念认为错误是基于历史的假设，而不是基于历史学的假设，传统观念认为边界是建立特定社会并进行长期文化交流的物理和社会空间。经验证的证据。这项工作提出了这样一个论点，即日益发展的封建国家不能容忍社会和时间方面的流动性和边界扩大。埃布罗河谷及其伊比利亚边缘就是这种情况。在1080年至1130年之间，征服破坏了泰法苏丹国的基础，并破坏了安达卢西亚社会。于是在1150年至1190年之间，加泰罗尼亚-阿拉贡主权国家强加于边界领土，而他们的贵族竞争者则错过了开始十三世纪巩固大型自治或半自治领地的机会，但阿尔巴拉辛除外。本文研究了加泰罗尼亚-阿拉贡人国家的这种根深蒂固的发生方式，并阻碍了“边界社会”的巩固。