A corollary to the exponential growth of digital technology is the increase in research interest in the construct of digital citizenship (DC) in diverse disciplinary areas. Although the term DC is used widely in research, scholars do not commit to a common definition. This integrative review investigates the conceptualizations and measurements of DC, across disciplines, in the extant literature. A systematic search of 11 databases identified a total of 350 unique items that contain “digital citizenship” in the title or keywords published by December 2018, with the majority published after 2010. Of these, 114 were peer-reviewed journal articles published in a wide range of discipline-specific venues, more than half of which were education-related. In-depth analyses show that each of the dominant conceptualizations of DC has been adopted by different disciplines, albeit with different popularities in adoption. Findings also revealed widely shared stakeholder concerns and research foci in DC research across the disciplines. However, there is a stark lack of empirical research on the young children, and an absence of commonly deployed research instruments in DC-related research. The present integrative review implicates the need for interdisciplinary collaboration for significant advances in DC research to address issues in policy and practice.

数字技术指数增长的必然结果是，在不同学科领域中对构建数字公民（DC）的研究兴趣不断增加。尽管DC一词在研究中被广泛使用，但学者们并没有遵循一个共同的定义。这篇综合性综述调查了现有文献中跨学科的DC的概念和度量。对11个数据库的系统搜索确定了总共350个独特的项目，这些独特的项目在2018年12月之前发布的标题或关键词中包含“数字公民”，其中大多数在2010年之后发布。其中114篇是同行评审的期刊文章，广泛发表于一系列特定学科的场所，其中一半以上与教育有关。深入的分析表明，DC的每个主要概念已被不同的学科采用，尽管采用的流行程度不同。研究结果还揭示了利益相关者广泛关注的问题以及跨学科DC研究中的研究重点。但是，对于幼儿的实证研究非常缺乏，并且在与DC相关的研究中也缺乏通常使用的研究工具。本综合综述暗示需要跨学科合作，以在DC研究方面取得重大进展，以解决政策和实践中的问题。并且在与DC相关的研究中缺少常用的研究工具。本综合综述暗示需要跨学科合作，以在DC研究方面取得重大进展，以解决政策和实践中的问题。并且在与DC相关的研究中缺少常用的研究工具。本综合综述暗示需要跨学科合作，以在DC研究方面取得重大进展，以解决政策和实践中的问题。