Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Differences in Risk Factors for Violent, Nonviolent, and Sexual Offending
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-28 , DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2020.1735248
Claudia E. van der Put 1 , Mark Assink 1 , Jeanne Gubbels 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Whether risk factors for recidivism are equally predictive in different offender groups and across recidivism types is a question of high clinical importance. Therefore, this study aimed to examine (a) differences in impact of general delinquency risk factors for three different recidivism types, and (b) differences in the presence of general delinquency risk factors between five different offender groups. The studied sample comprised 8,665 Dutch adult offenders, in which risk factors for recidivism were assessed with the Recidivism Risk Assessment Scales (RISc). Results showed that risk factors were generally stronger related to nonviolent than to violent recidivism, and only weakly or not at all related to sexual recidivism. The total prevalence of risk factors was highest in generalists (non-specialized offenders), followed by nonviolent, violent, sexual, and one-time offenders. In violent offenders, risk factors in the domains relationship with the partner/family, emotional well-being, antisocial personality patterns, and antisocial attitudes/cognitions were more prevalent than in nonviolent offenders, whereas in nonviolent offenders, risk factors in the domains education/work, financial management/income, antisocial friends/acquaintances, and drug abuse were more prevalent. In conclusion, risk factors differ in prevalence and impact across offender groups and recidivism types. Therefore, different treatment approaches are needed for successfully reducing different recidivism types across offender groups.

中文翻译:

暴力,非暴力和性犯罪的风险因素差异

摘要累犯的危险因素在不同犯罪人群中和跨累犯类型的预测是否均具有可预测性,这是具有高度临床重要性的问题。因此,本研究旨在研究(a)三种不同累犯类型的一般犯罪风险因素的影响差异,以及(b)五个不同犯罪群体之间存在一般犯罪风险因素的差异。研究样本包括8,665名荷兰成年罪犯,其中使用累犯风险评估量表(RISc)评估了累犯的风险因素。结果表明,与非累犯相比,与非累犯有关的危险因素通常更强,而与性累犯之间的关系则很小或根本没有。风险因素的总患病率在通才(非专业犯罪者)中最高,其次是非暴力,暴力,性和一次性犯罪者。在暴力犯罪者中,与伴侣/家人的关系,情感幸福感,反社会人格模式和反社会态度/认知的领域中的风险因素比非暴力犯罪者中更为普遍,而在非暴力犯罪者中,教育/工作,财务管理/收入,反社会朋友/熟人和药物滥用更为普遍。总之,在犯罪人群和累犯类型中,危险因素的流行程度和影响各不相同。因此,需要采用不同的治疗方法来成功减少跨犯罪人群的不同累犯类型。反社会人格模式和反社会态度/认知比非暴力罪犯更为普遍,而在非暴力罪犯中,教育/工作,财务管理/收入,反社会朋友/熟人和吸毒等领域的风险因素更为普遍。总之,在犯罪人群和累犯类型中,危险因素的流行程度和影响各不相同。因此,需要使用不同的治疗方法来成功减少跨犯罪群体的不同累犯类型。反社会人格模式和反社会态度/认知比非暴力罪犯更为普遍,而在非暴力罪犯中,教育/工作,财务管理/收入,反社会朋友/熟人和吸毒等领域的风险因素更为普遍。总之,在犯罪人群和累犯类型中,危险因素的流行程度和影响各不相同。因此,需要采用不同的治疗方法来成功减少跨犯罪人群的不同累犯类型。风险因素在犯罪人群和累犯类型中的流行程度和影响各不相同。因此,需要采用不同的治疗方法来成功减少跨犯罪人群的不同累犯类型。风险因素在犯罪人群和累犯类型中的流行程度和影响各不相同。因此,需要采用不同的治疗方法来成功减少跨犯罪人群的不同累犯类型。
更新日期:2020-02-28
down
wechat
bug