ABSTRACT Evidence-based models have demonstrated significant potential for improving outcome. However, it has been proposed that single-issue interventions cannot adequately address the multiple needs that some families experiences. This paper outlines a novel approach in which three evidence-based practices (Multisystemic Therapy, Incredible Years, and Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy) were concurrently implemented within the same programme. The objectives are to explore the experience and perceptions of practitioners who implemented the blended model, to explore the novelty of blended approaches, to examine the extent to which families were engaged in and were retained in this programme, and compare the outcomes for families who received blended and nonblended approaches. Method: Data was collected for 158 families between March 2014 and March 2016. Thirty-one families engaged in the blended approach. to explore the feasibility, semistructured interviews were undertaken with 14 staff. Results: Not all families are in need of a blended approach, but families who experience multiple complexities may benefit more from this type of approach. From the perspective of practitioners, blended models provide an opportunity to address multiple needs within the family. However, there are implementation challenges that could be explored further.

中文翻译：

---

从业者在家庭支持中使用混合模型的经验：涉及认知行为疗法（CBT），多系统疗法（MST）和不可思议的年份（IY）干预的概念验证研究

摘要基于证据的模型已显示出改善结果的巨大潜力。但是，已经提出，单发干预措施不能充分满足某些家庭所遇到的多重需求。本文概述了一种新颖的方法，其中在同一计划中同时实施了三种基于证据的实践（多系统疗法，不可思议的年限和认知行为疗法）。目的是探索实施混合模式的从业者的经验和看法，探索混合方法的新颖性，检查家庭参与该计划并在其中保留的程度，并比较接受该计划的家庭的结果混合和非混合方法。方法：2014年3月至2016年3月期间收集了158个家庭的数据。31个家庭参与了混合方法。为了探讨可行性，对14名员工进行了半结构化访谈。结果：并非所有家庭都需要混合方法，但是经历多种复杂情况的家庭可能会从这种方法中受益更多。从从业者的角度来看，混合模型为解决家庭中的多种需求提供了机会。但是，存在实施方面的挑战，可以进一步探讨。混合模型为解决家庭中的多种需求提供了机会。但是，存在实施方面的挑战，可以进一步探讨。混合模型为解决家庭中的多种需求提供了机会。但是，存在实施方面的挑战，可以进一步探讨。