ABSTRACT Researchers used thematic analysis to identify participant perceptions of the alignment between their faith traditions and family systems theory, structural family therapy, Bowen’s multigenerational theory, and narrative family therapy. Thirty-seven participants from six faith orientations, including 20 denominations or sects, responded to a survey. Patterns across responses indicate that family systems theory concepts are compatible across diverse faith traditions. Structural family therapy’s emphasis on restructuring boundaries and hierarchy is compatible across faith traditions as long as cultural and religious norms are carefully considered. Bowen’s concepts of detriangulation and differentiation are compatible across faith traditions, but particular beliefs may contradict the transmission of family patterns. Core concepts of narrative family therapy are compatible across faith traditions as long as therapists honor intuitive processes, include stories from clients’ faith traditions, and do not instill stories of false hope. Regardless of model, some clients may resist definitions of psychological dysfunction and understand illness and change as supernatural.

中文翻译：

---

家庭治疗模式的多信仰视角

摘要 研究人员使用主题分析来确定参与者对其信仰传统与家庭系统理论、结构性家庭治疗、鲍文的多代理论和叙事家庭治疗之间的一致性的看法。来自六个信仰方向的 37 名参与者，包括 20 个教派或教派，对一项调查做出了回应。跨响应的模式表明，家庭系统理论概念在不同的信仰传统中是兼容的。只要仔细考虑文化和宗教规范，结构性家庭治疗强调重构边界和等级制度，就可以跨越信仰传统。Bowen 的去三角化和分化概念在信仰传统中是兼容的，但特定的信仰可能与家庭模式的传播相矛盾。只要治疗师尊重直觉过程，包括来自客户信仰传统的故事，并且不灌输虚假希望的故事，叙事家庭治疗的核心概念就可以跨越信仰传统。不管模式如何，一些客户可能会抗拒心理功能障碍的定义，并将疾病和变化理解为超自然现象。