Wittgenstein’s and Heidegger’s objections against the possibility of a science of aesthetics were influential on different sides of the analytic/continental divide. Heidegger’s anti-scientism leads him to an alētheic view of artworks which precedes and exceeds any possible aesthetic reduction. Wittgenstein also rejects the relevance of causal explanations, psychological or physiological, to aesthetic questions. The main aim of this paper is to compare Heidegger with Wittgenstein, showing that: (a) there are significant parallels to be drawn between Wittgenstein’s and Heidegger’s anti-scientism about aesthetics, and that (b) their anti-scientism leads both towards partly divergent criticisms of what I will call ‘aestheticism’. The divergence is mainly due to a broader metaphilosophical disagreement concerning appeals to ordinary language. Thus situating the two philosophers’ positions facilitates a possible critical dialogue between analytic and continental approaches in aesthetics.

中文翻译：

---

维特根斯坦和海德格尔反对美学科学

维特根斯坦（Wittgenstein）和海德格尔（Heidegger）对美学科学的可能性的异议在分析/大陆鸿沟的不同方面都有影响。海德格尔的反科学主义使他对艺术产生了全神贯注的观点，这种观点先于并可能超出美学上的减少。维特根斯坦（Wittgenstein）还否认心理或生理上的因果解释与美学问题有关。本文的主要目的是将海德格尔与维特根斯坦进行比较，表明：（a）维特根斯坦和海德格尔关于美学的反科学主义之间存在明显的相似之处，并且（b）他们的反科学主义导致了两者之间的部分分歧对我称之为“美学主义”的批评。差异主要是由于在对普通语言的吸引力方面存在较广泛的元哲学分歧。