当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Token-Reflexivity and Repetition
Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy ( IF 0.5 ) Pub Date : 2018-09-07 , DOI: 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.028
Alexandru Radulescu

The classical rule of Repetition says that if you take any sentence as a premise and repeat it as a conclusion, you have a valid argument. It’s a very basic rule of logic, and many other rules depend on the guarantee that repeating a sentence, or really, any expression, guarantees sameness of referent, or semantic value. However, Repetition fails for token-reflexive expressions. In this paper, I offer three ways that one might replace Repetition, and still keep an interesting notion of validity. Each is a fine way to go for certain purposes, but I argue that one in particular is to be preferred by the semanticist who thinks that there are token-reflexive expressions in natural languages.

中文翻译:

令牌反射和重复

经典的重复规则说,如果您以任何句子为前提并重复作为结论,那么您就有一个有效的论点。这是一个非常基本的逻辑规则,许多其他规则依赖于以下保证:重复一个句子,或者实际上是任何表达式,都可以保证所指对象或语义值的相同性。但是,对于令牌自反表达式,重复失败。在本文中,我提供了三种方法可以替代重复,并且仍然保持一种有趣的有效性概念。每种方法都是实现某些特定目的的一种好方法,但我认为语义学家尤其希望采用一种方法,因为语义学家认为自然语言中存在令牌自反表达。
更新日期:2018-09-07
down
wechat
bug