In his article, “On the Processes of Subjectivation as a Subspecies of the Event: the Deleuzian Reading of the Later Foucault” Francisco Alcala discusses the well-known theoretical separation that occurred between Gilles Deleuze and Michel Foucault after the publication of The Will to Knowledge. Deleuze disagreed with the new function that Foucault attributed in this book to the apparatuses of power (to be constitutive of truth) because he considered that such an approach denied an inherent status to the phenomena of resistance, making all reality a truth of power. The aim of this paper is to analyze this controversy: first, from the confrontation of the concepts of apparatus and assemblage that made it appear; secondly, from the Deleuzian interpretation of the Foucaultian topic of the processes of subjectivation as a subspecies of the event, which finally resolves it. Francisco J. Alcalá, "On the Processes of Subjectiviation as a Subspecies of the Event: page 2 of 9 the Deleuzian reading of the Later Foucalt" CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20.4 (2018): Special Issue Processes of Subjectivation: Biopolitics and Politics of Literature. Ed. Azucena G. Blanco

中文翻译：

---

作为事件的一个亚种的主观化过程：德福祖对后来的福柯的解读

弗朗西斯科·阿尔卡拉（Francisco Alcala）在他的文章“关于作为事件的亚种的主观化过程：德洛伊兹对后来的福柯的解读”中，讨论了《知识的意志》出版后吉尔斯·德勒兹和米歇尔·福柯之间发生的众所周知的理论分离。 。德勒兹不同意福柯在本书中将新功能赋予权力装置（构成真理的本能）的原因，因为他认为这种方法否认了抵抗现象的固有地位，使所有现实成为了权力的真理。本文的目的是分析这一争议：首先，从使它出现的设备和组件概念的对抗出发；其次，从德鲁兹对福柯主题的解释-作为事件的一个亚种的主观过程中，终于解决了。弗朗西斯科·J·阿尔卡拉（Francisco J.Alcalá），“关于将主观化作为事件的亚种：第9页的第2页，德洛伊兹对后来的Foucalt的解读” CLCWeb：比较文学与文化20.4（2018）：主观特刊过程：生物政治与政治文学。埃德 Azucena G.布兰科