This article is based on two hypotheses. The first is that in the later Foucault we would find a reformulation of the status that literature had occupied in his work and the development of a politics of literature (already developed in “Sujetos irregulares: ficción y política en el Sade de Michel Foucault”). The second considers that fiction and desire are inseparably joined, which leads me to analyse the logic of Sade as logic of desire in the lectures that Foucault gave on the author at the University of Buffalo (1970). A reading of both aspects together needs to be undertaken so that we can understand, on the one hand, Foucault’s work on the institutional character of literature with which he aimed to pull literature out of its political impasse. Methodologically, this focus enables us to understand how literature occupied a central-marginal place in his work. On the other hand, we need to understand his work on the genealogy of the “subject of desire” and of the alternative forms of subjectivity, and how it is in dialogue with the former aspect. I conclude that his politics of literature is associated with the concept of “bad literature” and with an aesthetics of self as politics of desire/duty. This paper is therefore also a proposal for the interpretation of the role that literature plays in one of the central questions: the definition of the subject as interrelation in late Foucault. Azucena G. Blanco, "The Politics of Literature in Michel Foucault: Veridiction, Fiction, and Desire. " page 2 of 8 CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20.4 (2018): Special Issue Processes of Subjectivation: Biopolitics and the Politics of Literature

中文翻译：

---

“米歇尔•福柯的文学政治：证伪，小说和欲望”

本文基于两个假设。首先是在后来的福柯中，我们将对文学在他的作品中所处的地位以及文学政治的发展进行重新表述（已经在“ Sujetos Regulares：ficciónypolíticaen el Sade de Michel Foucault”中得到了发展） 。第二种观点认为，小说和欲望是密不可分的，这使我在福柯在布法罗大学（1970）的演讲中分析了萨德作为欲望的逻辑。需要一起阅读这两个方面，以便我们一方面可以理解福柯关于文学的制度性的工作，他旨在借此使文学摆脱其政治僵局。从方法上讲 这种关注使我们能够理解文学如何在他的作品中占据中心位置。另一方面，我们需要了解他关于“欲望主体”的谱系和主观性的替代形式的工作，以及他与前者对话的方式。我得出的结论是，他的文学政治与“不良文学”的概念有关，并与作为欲望/责任政治的自我美学有关。因此，本文也是对文学在以下核心问题中扮演的角色的解释的建议：在福柯晚期将主题定义为相互关系。Azucena G. Blanco，“米歇尔·福柯的文学政治：证伪，小说和欲望。”第2页，共8页CLCWeb：比较文学与文化20.4（2018）：主观问题的特殊发行过程：