In his article "Literature of the Self in Foucault: Parrhesia and Autobiographical Discourse" Álvaro Luque Amo analyzes the framework of Foucault’s study of the technologies of the self. In his study, Michel Foucault analyses the practices of self-writing in the Graeco-Roman period. From this perspective, Foucault approaches the texts of classical authors to interpret what he calls a process of ethopoiesis, or construction of the subject: a subject who tells the truth about himself in the text. Foucault introduces concepts and ideas that are essential to understanding the evolution of autobiography and literature of the self. This article studies this Foucauldian perspective with the aim of considering these texts as a precedent of modern literature of the self. First, Pierre Hadot’s objections to Foucauldian notions are discussed; secondly, this article analyses the concept of parrhesia as a precedent to a writing of truth. Lastly, all of the above is used in the final section of the article to connect Senecan texts with Montaigne’s Essays, by way of illustration of the main thesis. Álvaro Luque Amo, "Literature of the Self in Foucault: Parrhesia and Autobiographical Discourse" page 2 of 9 CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20.4 (2018): Special Issue Processes of Subjectivation: Biopolitics and Politics of Literature. Ed. Azucena G. Blanco

中文翻译：

---

福柯自我文学：腹痛和自传体话语

阿尔瓦罗·卢克·阿莫（Allvaro Luque Amo）在他的文章《福柯的自我文学：腹痛和自传语篇》中分析了福柯对自我技术的研究框架。米歇尔·福柯（Michel Foucault）在他的研究中分析了古希腊罗马时期的自我写作习惯。从这个角度来看，福柯研究古典作家的著作，以解释他所谓的精神病学过程或主体的建构：一个主体在文本中讲述自己的真相。福柯介绍了一些概念和思想，这些概念和思想对于理解自传和自我文学的发展至关重要。本文研究这种富国主义观点，旨在将这些文本视为现代自我文学的先例。首先，讨论了Pierre Hadot对Foucauldian概念的反对；其次，本文分析了“稀世”的概念，以此作为编写真理的先例。最后，在本文的最后部分中，使用以上所有内容，通过对主要论文的说明，将塞内加尔语的文本与蒙田格涅的散文联系起来。阿尔瓦罗·卢克·阿莫（ÁlvaroLuque Amo），“福柯的自我文学：腹痛和自传体话语”，第2页，共9页CLCWeb：比较文学与文化20.4（2018）：主体化的特殊过程：生物政治与文学政治。埃德 Azucena G.布兰科