Abstract Karen Barad’s Meeting the Universe Halfway relies on mutually incompatible grounding gestures, one of which describes the relationality of an always already material-discursive reality, while the other seeks to ground this relation one-sidedly in matter. These two materialisms derive from the gesture she borrows from the New Materialist (and other related) fields, which posits her work as an advance over the history of “representationalism” and “social constructivism.” In turn, this one-sided materialism produces a skewed reading of the quantum mechanical phenomena with which she engages. Her attempt to create an ontological (not epistemological) interpretation of quantum mechanics proves deconstructible. Instead, a science of undecidability or science of quant à helps us to understand debates among scientists and philosophers over the completeness or incompleteness of quantum mechanics and its epistemological or ontological status – by demonstrating that these questions will necessarily remain unresolved.

中文翻译：

---

其他事项

摘要 Karen Barad 的《Meet the Universe Halfway》依赖于相互不相容的基础姿态，其中一种姿态描述了一个总是已经是物质话语的现实的关系，而另一种则试图在物质中片面地建立这种关系。这两种唯物主义源于她从新唯物主义（和其他相关）领域借用的姿态，这将她的作品视为对“表象主义”和“社会建构主义”历史的进步。反过来，这种片面的唯物主义产生了对她所从事的量子力学现象的歪曲解读。她对量子力学的本体论（而非认识论）解释的尝试证明是可以解构的。反而，