The strategies of rapid urbanization and rural revitalization have fostered the emergence of transforming neighborhoods. Using a framework integrating multiple spatial attributes that embeds the administrative nature of space in its social nature and raises the level of its governance, this paper provides theoretical generalizations for the social governance communities of transforming neighborhoods on the basis of a typology that divides them into four types: social governance communities of individually constructed neighborhoods, social governance communities in post-demolition constructed neighborhoods, social governance communities in immigrant constructed neighborhoods, and social governance communities in collectively constructed neighborhoods. Social governance communities of transforming neighborhoods emerge in the course of spatial reconstruction and redevelopment of production. At the stage of space reconstruction, the administrative nature of space plays its part in developing differentiated spatial governance features, while the social nature of space takes effect through the establishment of four types of social governance community social networks: the loosely connected network, the multiple components network, the close interest network and the highly associated network. At the stage of space production, the social nature of space is embedded in governance and takes effect through the integration of top-down administrative control and bottom-up resident autonomy. Consequently, we see the generation of four governance strategies of administration that adjust the autonomy of social governance communities: “control—superficial governance,” “guidance— deliberative governance,” “support—collaborative governance,” and “leading—governance by the people.” In terms of theory, this study conducts a theoretical dialogue with the existing “controlled autonomy” and “autonomy with administrative elimination,” and in terms of practice, it has implications for strengthening popular rule by neighborhood social governance communities and filling the ability gap in such communities.

中文翻译：

---

转型社区中的社会治理社区：一种空间重构的视角

快速城市化和农村振兴战略促进了社区转变的出现。通过使用一个集成了多个空间属性的框架，该框架将空间的行政性质嵌入其社会性质并提高了其治理水平，本文根据分类将社区分为四类的类型，为转变社区的社会治理社区提供了理论概括。类型：个体建造社区的社会治理社区，拆除后建设社区的社会治理社区，移民建设社区的社会治理社区和集体建设社区的社会治理社区。在空间重建和生产再开发过程中，出现了转型社区的社会治理社区。在空间重建阶段，空间的行政性在发展差异化的空间治理特征中发挥着作用，而空间的社会性则通过建立四种类型的社会治理社区社会网络来发挥作用：松散连接的网络，多元的网络。组件网络，密切关注网络和高度关联的网络。在空间生产阶段，空间的社会性质已嵌入治理中，并通过自上而下的行政控制与自下而上的居民自治相结合而发挥作用。所以，我们看到产生了四种调整社会治理自治权的行政治理策略：“控制—表面治理”，“指导—协商治理”，“支持—合作治理”和“领导—人民治理”。从理论上讲，该研究与现有的“受控自治”和“有行政淘汰的自治”进行了理论对话，从实践上看，它对加强邻里社会治理社区的民意统治和填补社区的能力差距具有重要意义。这样的社区。