The new types of cybercrime have different features from traditional “cumulative crimes.” The application of the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law has run into difficulties, and the relevant theoretical explanations of substantive preparatory crime and being an accomplice in crime find it hard to achieve self-consistency. Legislation on the new types of cybercrime is a legitimate response to recent changes in this area. Utilizing the particular techniques of cybercrime and the circumstantial requirement of limiting the amount of criminal harm is the key to satisfying the conditions for offences warranting criminal punishment. The harmfulness of the new types of cybercrime is not great; the law’s circumstantial requirements are flexible, and the criteria for judicial application are unclear, so the law’s provisions are seldom invoked and the sphere of criminal activity is unduly expanded. In order to give full play to the effectiveness of this legislation, we should formulate reasonable judicial rules that accord with the constitution of cybercrimes, narrow down the constituent elements of such crimes in a reasonable way, and categorize and limit the interpretation of circumstantial requirements.

中文翻译：

---

新型网络犯罪的立法及其应用

新型的网络犯罪与传统的“累积性犯罪”具有不同的特征。《刑法》有关规定的适用陷入困境，有关实质性预备犯罪和作为犯罪分子的帮凶的相关理论解释发现，难以实现自给自足。新型网络犯罪立法是对该领域最近变化的合理回应。利用网络犯罪的特殊技术以及限制刑事损害程度的环境要求，是满足犯罪条件的必要条件。新型网络犯罪的危害性不大。法律对环境的要求是灵活的，司法适用的标准尚不明确，因此很少引用法律的规定，并且犯罪活动的领域被过度扩大。为了充分发挥该立法的效力，我们应制定符合网络犯罪构成的合理司法规则，以合理的方式缩小此类犯罪的构成要件，并对环境要求的解释进行分类和限制。