Abstract We-media’s influence on judicial credibility has become increasingly apparent in the changing modes of information communication. Interpretation of a sample of influential lawsuits in the light of reason will reveal the core elements shaping the public’s judgements on criminal cases, including both internal elements centering on trust, reputation and interaction and external elements centering on transaction costs. Our quantitative assessment of the role of trust, reputation and interaction in the public’s views on criminal justice plus a comparison of the differences between their understanding and that of grassroots legal officials reflect the fact that underlying these rational choices is the clouding of judicial credibility due to contravention of the rules of justice. If we are to build judicial credibility, it is essential that we establish a sound relationship between the public and the criminal justice system, a relationship based on upholding the idea of rule of law and respecting the rules of justice.

中文翻译：

---

媒体时代的司法公信力：合理性，构成要素与建构

摘要随着信息传播方式的不断变化，We-media对司法公信力的影响越来越明显。根据理性对有影响力的诉讼样本进行解释，将揭示塑造公众对刑事案件判决的核心要素，包括以信任，声誉和互动为中心的内部要素，以及以交易成本为中心的外部要素。我们对信任，声誉和互动在公众对刑事司法的看法中的作用的定量评估，以及对公众理解与基层法律官员的理解之间的差异的比较，反映出这样一个事实，即这些理性选择的根本原因在于司法公信力的模糊违反司法规则。如果我们要建立司法公信力，