The main aim of this article is to show how a possible theoretical articulation between Uexkull’s notion of Funktionskreis and the stratificational model of semiotic structures proposed by Louis Hjelmslev can be made. In order to bridge the gap between these two models, Luis Prieto’s model of cognition will be used. The advantage of Prieto’s model is that it retains the Hjelmslevian stratificational ideas (i.e. a semiotic structure is made up of an expression and a content plane, each one with a dimension of form and substance), while it also pays attention to agency and practice. To put it briefly, according to Prieto the foundation of practice and knowledge is to be found on aisthesis . Hence, as in Uexkull, there is a way to merge action with perception, while retaining the semiotic structure that makes such a merging possible. The key point, however, is that Prieto’s model calls for an “ontological commitment” to the substance strata (both in expression and in content to some extent). Therefore, bridging Uexkull and Hjelmslev via Prieto suggests a possible way to provide a general structural model of semiosis which is closer to semiotic realism than to immanentism usually attributed to structuralism.

中文翻译：

---

Funktionskreis和符号结构分层模型：Jakob vonUexküll，Luis Prieto和Louis Hjelmslev

本文的主要目的是说明如何在Uexkull的Funktionskreis概念与Louis Hjelmslev提出的符号结构分层模型之间进行理论上的阐述。为了弥合这两个模型之间的差距，将使用路易斯·普里托的认知模型。普列托模型的优势在于，它保留了耶姆斯列夫主义的分层思想（即符号结构由一种表达和一个内容平面组成，每个平面都具有形式和实质的维度），同时它也关注代理和实践。简而言之，根据普列托（Prieto）的观点，可以在麻醉上找到实践和知识的基础。因此，就像在Uexkull中一样，有一种方法可以将动作与感知融合，同时保留使这种融合成为可能的符号结构。关键点 然而，是普列托的模型要求对物质层次（在某种程度上在表达和内容上）都存在“本体论承诺”。因此，通过Prieto桥接Uexkull和Hjelmslev提出了一种提供符号学通用结构模型的可能方法，该模型更接近于符号学实在论，而不是通常归因于结构主义的内在主义。