This article compares two different approaches to the humanities in general and to anthropology in particular, represented by two renowned French scholars, Claude Levi-Strauss (1908–2009) and Germaine Tillion (1907–2008). While Levi- Strauss emphasized the importance of an objective stance in the humanities and wanted to eliminate all subjectivity, Tillion desired to reserve an exclusive role for subjectivity, preferring human individuals to abstractions. The article suggests looking for the reason for these opposite positions within the disparate experiences the two scholars had during World War II: an American university life for Levi-Strauss, and “humanist classes” in a German concentration camp for Tillion. A person who had been through the schooling at Ravensbruck could not arrive at the same conception of the field as another whose experiences came from the campus of an American university.

中文翻译：

---

两种人文学科方法：克劳德·莱维·斯特劳斯和杰曼·泰里恩

本文比较了两种不同的一般性人类学方法，尤其是人类学方法，以两位著名的法国学者克劳德·列维·斯特劳斯（Claude Levi-Strauss，1908–2009年）和Germaine Tillion（1907–2008年）为代表。列维·斯特劳斯（Levi-Strauss）强调了人文科学中客观立场的重要性，并希望消除所有主观性，而泰利安（Tillion）希望保留主观性的排他性角色，宁愿人类而不是抽象。本文建议在两位学者在第二次世界大战期间经历的截然不同的经历中寻找这些相反立场的原因：在美国为李维·斯特劳斯（Levi-Strauss）的大学生活，以及在德国泰利安集中营的“人文课”。