当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
LGB individuals’ preferences for psychotherapy theoretical orientations: Results from two studies
Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services Pub Date : 2020-02-18 , DOI: 10.1080/10538720.2020.1728463
Shannon M. McCarrick 1 , Timothy Anderson 1 , Andrew S. McClintock 1
Affiliation  

Abstract The aim of Study 1 was to determine whether preferences for psychotherapy theoretical orientations (PTOs) differ between LGB and heterosexual persons. Eighty-four LGB and 87 heterosexual participants read descriptions of three traditional PTOs (i.e., cognitive behavioral [CBT], humanistic [HT], and psychodynamic [PT]), then chose their most preferred PTO. PTO preferences did not differ between LGB and heterosexual participants. The aim of Study 2 was to determine whether LGB persons prefer an LGB affirmative PTO (LGB-AT) to traditional PTOs. Eighty-two LGB participants read descriptions, then chose their preferred PTO among CBT, HT, PT, and LGB-AT. They preferred CBT to LGB-AT.

中文翻译:

LGB个人对心理治疗理论取向的偏爱:两项研究的结果

摘要研究1的目的是确定LGB和异性恋者对心理治疗理论取向(PTO)的偏好是否不同。84名LGB和87名异性恋参与者阅读了三种传统PTO(即认知行为[CBT],人文[HT]和心理动力[PT])的描述,然后选择了他们最喜欢的PTO。LGB和异性恋参与者之间的PTO偏好没有差异。研究2的目的是确定LGB人是否比传统PTO更喜欢LGB肯定性PTO(LGB-AT)。八十二名LGB参与者阅读了说明,然后在CBT,HT,PT和LGB-AT中选择了他们偏爱的PTO。他们更喜欢CBT而不是LGB-AT。
更新日期:2020-02-18
down
wechat
bug