Abstract One of the most notable gaps in the growing field examining parents' adjustments to their offspring's nonheterosexuality concerns parents' responses to same-sex marriage and (grand)children from nonheterosexual relationships. Informed both by the life stories of gay, lesbian, and bisexual (GLB) migrants who are married or raising children with a same-sex partner in Belgium and the Netherlands and by the accounts of their parents living in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries with a constitutional protection of heterosexual marriage, this study addresses this gap. It also takes the inquiry a step further by situating it within the framework of contrasting normative expectations. This approach identifies how parents' responses and disclosures, though firmly situated in the context of their homonegative CEE environments, also negotiate new expectations formed by their GLB offspring in GLB-friendly Belgian and Dutch environments. In addition, this study highlights both the parents' difficult negotiation of same-sex marriage and the role of children in facilitating the acceptance of same-sex families in the CEE context. The implications of these patterns—particularly the transformative power of same-sex marriage and nonheterosexual reproductivity—are further situated into a wider intimate citizenship debate on the consequences of the inclusion of GLB individuals into the mainstream institutions.

中文翻译：

---

同性婚姻和非异性生殖的转化能力。GLB后代的父母如何适应自己的婚姻和子女

摘要在研究父母对其后代非异性恋关系的调整的增长领域中，最显着的差距之一是父母对同性婚姻和非异性恋子女的回应。获悉在比利时和荷兰已婚或育有同性伴侣的同性，女同性恋和双性恋（GLB）移民的生活故事，以及居住在中欧和东欧（CEE）的父母的资料拥有宪法保护异性婚姻的国家，本研究解决了这一差距。它还通过将查询置于对比性规范预期的框架内，使查询更进一步。这种方法确定了父母的回应和披露方式，尽管在同质的CEE环境中处于牢固地位，但也要商讨由GLB子孙在GLB友好的比利时和荷兰环境中形成的新期望。此外，本研究强调了父母在同性婚姻方面的艰难谈判以及孩子在促进中欧和东欧背景下接受同性家庭方面的作用。这些模式的含义，尤其是同性婚姻和非异性生殖能力的转化能力，被进一步置于关于将GLB个人纳入主流机构的后果的更广泛的亲密公民辩论中。同性婚姻的艰难谈判以及儿童在促进中欧和东欧背景下接受同性家庭方面的作用。这些模式的含义，尤其是同性婚姻和非异性生殖能力的转化能力，被进一步置于关于将GLB个人纳入主流机构的后果的更广泛的亲密公民辩论中。同性婚姻的艰难谈判以及儿童在促进中欧和东欧背景下接受同性家庭方面的作用。这些模式的含义，尤其是同性婚姻和非异性生殖能力的转化能力，被进一步置于关于将GLB个人纳入主流机构的后果的更广泛的亲密公民辩论中。